Study
How Technology Can Boost Health for Cancer Survivors
Using smartphone apps and activity trackers may improve health after cancer.
Technology & HealthCancer PreventionHealthy Aging
Summary
In plain language
Researchers are looking into how technology, like smartphones and activity trackers, can help cancer survivors stay healthy. They found that these tools can encourage people to move more and feel better. With many cancer survivors facing challenges like feeling tired or having pain, using technology could be a simple way to improve their quality of life. However, not everyone is using these tools yet. It's important for seniors to know that these gadgets might help them stay active and share important health information with their doctors.
Details
Use the full description to understand the study design, methods, and the limits of the findings.
This study explored the use of mobile technology among cancer survivors to promote healthy habits. Researchers surveyed over 700 people, mostly under 65, to see who uses health apps and activity trackers. They found that younger, married, and more educated individuals were more likely to use these tools. However, only about a third of participants used health apps, despite nearly all owning smartphones.
- Participants with higher incomes and education levels were more likely to own activity trackers.
- Most people were open to sharing data from these devices with healthcare providers.
- Barriers like comfort with technology and access may affect usage.
Discussing these findings with your healthcare provider could help you decide if using these tools might benefit your health.
Full Study
Open the original publication for the complete methods, outcomes, and source material.
Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)
How Technology Can Boost Health for Cancer Survivors
Published April 2026 · DOI 10.1002/cnr2.70536
Opens at the publisher · external site · may require institutional access
Research Quality Score
Assessment
The study provides valuable insights into the use of mHealth technologies among cancer survivors, though its cross-sectional design limits causal inferences. The methodology is transparent, and the study is published in a reputable journal. However, the relevance to seniors is limited due to the younger age of most participants.
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Study Design / Evidence Level | 5.0/10 | |
| Bias & Methods | 5.0/10 | |
| Statistical Integrity | 5.0/10 | |
| Transparency | 10.0/10 | |
| Conflict of Interest Disclosure | 10.0/10 | |
| Replication / External Validation | 5.0/10 | |
| Relevance to Seniors | 5.0/10 | |
| Journal Quality | 10.0/10 |
Additional Notes
The study's focus on technology adoption among cancer survivors is timely, but future research should aim for more diverse and senior-focused samples to enhance relevance to older adults.
Treatments Evaluated in This Research
Review the interventions studied here and compare them against the broader treatment library.
Take the next step
Build a personalized plan using research-backed studies, conditions, and treatments.